Two years ago, on the threshold of a new national
election, the University of Delhi was in spate.
The vice -chancellor, wielding the gauntlet
of power, had been running amok. His associate, the pro-vice-chancellor, stepped
down and retreated inexplicably, into an
FMS cell. The rest of the vice-chancellor’s team, personally recruited, surrounded him and sang ceaseless hosannas. In fact, such is the aura of a Vice Chancellor
in office that teachers from undergraduate colleges shunned food and drink till the very end ,
identifying with his blundering
ambitions. Over high drama, with massive
student participation, the FYUP was rolled back.
University teachers
went back to work with good intentions hoping to restore university life to normalcy. The
trouble with these good intentions, is that they paved the way to a rather
murky CBCS hell. The university was left
to its own devices, with a vengeful
vice-chancellor hard-driving the last big nails into the coffin of the university. Appointments continued to be stage- managed and retiring teachers were denied their rightful dues by throwing in a spanner
into a well-oiled and efficiently functioning
pension and provident fund system.
The MHRD, has for
some years now, conducted itself as one of the last colonial outposts of
Independent India: visualizing its role as braving it out and attempting to instill honour and discipline among unruly natives. Smriti Irani’s homespun headship did not
disturb us initially, because Sibal and Tharoor, despite their Indian roots, were unabashedly
dazzled by foreign degrees and the proverbial pieces of silver, lining the
coffers of private universities.
In the summer of 2015 the University of Delhi retained its hostile vice-chancellor and a new Choice Based
Credit System (CBCS) that
magically spread its tentacles over the
entire university. Why did we not resist this? Arguably, dismantling FYUP had taken up a lot of
our energies and dissipated the rest. Great
discontent and embitterment replaced the fight that had gone out of our lives,
along with all semblance of light.
We crawled awhile in a dark tunnel, supervised by ministries
and commissions suffering from tunnel vision themselves, awaiting the coming of the new Vice-Chancellor. He has come, blowing upon his conch, but we
cannot see him and he cannot hear us at all. Universities now recruit Vice-Chancellors and ensure the dimming of
spotlights so that both vision and perception become a constant blur.
The machinations in higher education are no longer put in place by one or two
whimsical individuals: this is an amorphous, gnawing force, eventually reducing
institutions to rubble. A new Gazette
has unfurled
itself on staffroom notice boards,
offering solutions to all our problems.
Q. How do we
deal with increased student
strength, diminishing infrastructure,
non-recruitment of teachers and
vacancies that have not been filled in years?
A: Combine two
practicals into one, and make all tutorials advisory. Our prime minister is able to speak to the
entire nation whenever he needs to
through one solitary mann ki
baat. Teachers should not find it difficult to put forward their mann ki baat to miniscule groups of hundreds.
Increase individual teacher workload from 14 to 22 and 16 to 24 hours)This will automatically reduce the number of teachers
and do away with all problems of recruitment
Q. Aren’t university teachers in India in any case
teaching far more than their contemporaries in other parts of the world?
A: Our rules we must make in India! Teachers will earn more under the seventh pay commission
implementation. They must be seen earning their money; forty hour work weeks
indicated at the time of the sixth pay commission, will now be implemented
Q. Teaching overloads will not help teachers or
students. Traffic rules do not allow overloaded
vehicles on the street. Why must students and teachers be put under pressure?
A: Vehicles are not
allowed to carry too much weight. In the case of the university, we have
truncated or thrown out each and every lode-bearing
curriculum. Our schooling systems have failed and so have our vocational
training systems. Therefore the Universities must turn into Skill Development Centres.
Q. For years young teachers have held
ad-hoc jobs and have also gone on to raise families without maternity leave or the
security of summer salaries. Surely this is demoralising and distressful?
A: They were employed under the previous regime. We have sufficient candidates of our own, so
order will be restored soon enough.
Q. Wouldn’t you agree
that poor infrastructure and lack of facilities impedes the daily functioning of the
university.
A: Undue
emphasis is laid on infrastructure.”
Lectures can be held behind a banyan tree.” (in the words of a visiting NAAC
team)
Q. Classrooms are filled
with students way beyond recommended numbers. Surely, students need mentoring and guidance
and ideal studying conditions. Teachers also need to add to their learning.
A: Each teacher shall take
on holistic responsibility( the emotional and mental wellbeing) of around 25
students each, over and above the prescribed minimum teaching schedule. This
will take make for a productive 40 hour week . The emphasis will be on teacher- student interaction,
and will maintain teacher student ratio. We have also highlighted the journals that
will accept research papers that teachers
may wish to write in their free
time. A master plan of research topics is on its way to standardise research. We are efficient and we shall deliver.
Some questions still remain
unanswered:
The CBCS has not provided the transformative make-in-India impetus
inundating each pore of
current government policy in the academic year that has recently concluded.
The FYUP has been born again as a three year program, renamed as CBCS, and is of little academic worth. CBCS is another hurriedly
cobbled venture with little legitimacy. The English (Hons)Syllabus is a packed pot-pourri over two years. At the end of
two years, we hurriedly push students with half-baked inputs into the
high temperatures of research production, possibly scorching and burning them
for life. This cannot be the raison-d-etre
of literature or liberal arts programmes. FYUPs delinquent compulsory foundation programmes have been replaced by banal AECC compulsories under CBCS.
English writing skills leave much to be desired, going by what
has been on display. Over several years,
the emphasis on the ability to think
has been replaced by the skill required to fill in blanks. Important readings,
literature, essays and poetry have been shelved, making language and
disciplines functional, thereby reducing learning to limited skill. This USP, entrenched in our schooling
system, is now taking over university syllabi. This is not what we want for resurgent India.
We do not want to ‘make in India,’ a soulless and unthinking future, for generations
of our young citizens.
The cruel trick that the CBCS plays by calling itself a
choice based credit system is now being
stamped on all learning schedules in the second year. University Departments
mandate and select one option in each credit course (that has six to eight
options). This is reinforced by Academic Planning Committees and implemented by
college departments. The student is taught a truncated main course and has very
little choice when it comes to the credit courses as well.
In the Sciences, students tend to opt for credit courses requiring fewer hours. This undesirable and unintelligent precedent of privileging
some main courses over others highlights the
short sighted rules that have been set in motion.
Responding to the
continued onslaught on Higher education, teachers have put aside differences, taken
to the streets, flocked to the GBM, boycotted evaluations, and listened in one
voice to the DUTA leadership. This collective show of strength is important and
welcome for it will now begin to define us. Long marches and protests await and
this will be a grim, protracted struggle.
“Teachers of the University; Stay United! Else we stand to lose
pretty much everything!
The higher education in the country seems to be in a mess, thanks to ad hoc policies/ measures taken by the authorities, with no thought given to the the teachers on who are the ones at the forefront of our education system.
ReplyDelete